Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Á¢ÂøÀçÀÇ Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ In-Ceram µµÀç°üÀÇ º¯¿¬ÀûÇÕµµ¿Í ÆÄÀý°­µµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

MARGINAL FIDELITY AND FRACTURE STRENGTH OF IN-CERAM CROWNS ACCORDING TO VAR10US RESIN CEMENTS

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 36±Ç 6È£ p.888 ~ 899
ÀÓÁÖȯ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÓÁÖȯ ( Lim Ju-Hwan ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


In-Ceram system is one of contemporary esthetic all ceramic restorations and has relatively high flexural strength. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal fidelity according to type of resin cement and measuring position, and to evaluate fracture strength according to type of resin cement. In this study, twenty seven In-Ceram crowns were fabricated on the metal master die of prepared maxillary right central incisor and devided into three groups. All specimens were cemented with Panavia 21 (group PV), Super-bond (group SB) and Lute-it (group LI) on the metal master die. After cementation, specimens were measured marginal gap between the margin of the In-Ceram crown and the finishing line of metal master die by using a stereomicroscope (SZ-ST, Olympus, Japan). Marginal gaps were recorded at the labial, lingual, mesial and distal measuring points on the metal master die. For the mesurement of fracture strength, lingual surfaces of cemented specimens were loaded at a distance of 1mm from incisal edge by using the Autograph S-2000 (Shimadzu, Japan). The results of marginal fidelity and fracture strength were statistically analyzed with the SPSS version 8.0 programs. The results of this study were as follows: 1. In comparison of marginal fidelity according to the measuring points, there was no significant difference. 2. The marginal fidelity according to the type of resin cement was decreased in order of group LI (63.75micrometer), SB (77.78micrometer), PV (86.53micrometer), and there was significant difference between group LI and PV (p<0.05). 3. The fracture strength according to the type of resin cement was showed descending order of group LI (60.00kg/cm2), SB (56.80kg/cm2), PV (56.11kg/cm2), but there was no significant difference.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed